Roadrunner Capitol Reports Roadrunner Capitol Reports
Legislation Detail
CS/HB 344 HEALTHCARE EQUIPMENT GROSS RECEIPTS
Sponsored By: Rep Dayan (Day) Mercedes Hochman-Vigil

Actions: [4] HHHC/HTRC-HHHC [10] DNP-CS/DP-HTRC

Scheduled: Not Scheduled

Summary:
 The House Health and Human Services Committee substitute for House Bill 344 (HHHCcs/HB 344) makes several modifications to the Gross Receipts Tax (GRT) deductions for health care services, medical equipment, supplies, and drugs. It removes the sunset date for a deduction related to copayments and deductibles paid by insured patients to health care practitioners. It also introduces a new GRT deduction for receipts from patients paying directly for health care services, provided that these services are not performed under a contract with a managed care organization (MCO) or health care insurer. Additionally, the bill allows for a deduction on the sale of medical equipment, supplies, and drugs used within the practice of health care providers. The bill further modifies Medicaid reimbursement regulations by requiring that gross receipts taxes be itemized within the reimbursement rates for Medicaid providers contracting with managed care organizations. The provisions take effect on July 1, 2025. 
Legislation Overview:
 House Bill 344 (HB 344) expands the scope of gross receipts tax deductions available for health care-related transactions. The bill extends deductions for receipts from patients paying for health care services outside managed care or health insurance contracts. It also removes the repeal provision for deductions on copayments and deductibles paid by insured individuals to health care practitioners, ensuring that these deductions remain in effect indefinitely. The bill further provides gross receipts tax deductions for sales of medical equipment, supplies, and drugs when purchased by health care practitioners or their associations, as long as these items are used within their practice.

A significant provision of HB 344 ensures that Medicaid reimbursements include compensation for the gross receipts taxes that health care providers are required to pay. This change aims to alleviate the financial burden on providers accepting Medicaid patients by offsetting the costs associated with gross receipts tax obligations. The bill requires taxpayers utilizing these deductions to report the claimed amounts separately, allowing for improved transparency and oversight. The deductions will also be included in the tax expenditure budget to facilitate ongoing evaluation of their fiscal impact. HB 344 takes effect on July 1, 2025.

Implications

HB 344 will result in a reduction in gross receipts tax revenue at the state and local levels due to the expanded tax deductions for health care services and medical supplies. The impact on state revenue will depend on the number of health care providers and suppliers claiming these deductions. Local governments that rely on gross receipts tax revenue may also experience declines, though the overall fiscal impact will be influenced by the volume of transactions eligible for the deductions.

The provision ensuring Medicaid reimbursement for gross receipts taxes paid by health care providers will increase Medicaid expenditures, potentially requiring additional state funds to cover the expanded reimbursement obligations. The bill does not specify a funding source for this provision, which may necessitate adjustments to the state budget to accommodate higher Medicaid reimbursement costs.

By reducing tax burdens on health care providers, HB 344 may incentivize increased participation in the Medicaid program and encourage more direct patient transactions outside managed care networks. While this could improve access to health care services, particularly in underserved areas, it may also result in higher Medicaid costs for the state. The inclusion of these deductions in the tax expenditure budget ensures that their fiscal impact will be periodically reviewed.
 
Current Law:
 Under current law, New Mexico provides limited GRT deductions for health care services. Certain managed care contract payments are already deductible, but patient-paid services and out-of-pocket expenses remain subject to taxation. The Medicaid reimbursement system does not currently require itemization of GRT liabilities, leading to uncertainty for health care providers about how taxes are factored into their payments. 
Committee Substitute:
 Committee Substitute February 26, 2025 in HHHC: 

HHHCcs/HB 344: House Health and Human Services Committee Substitute for House Bill 344 makes several key changes to existing law regarding Gross Receipts Tax (GRT) deductions for health care providers and Medicaid reimbursements. It removes the July 1, 2028, sunset date for an existing deduction that allows health care practitioners or their associations to deduct copayments and deductibles paid by insured patients under commercial contracts. By making this deduction permanent, the bill ensures that practitioners continue to receive GRT relief on these payments beyond the previously established expiration date.

The bill further expands GRT deductions by introducing a new deduction for receipts from direct payments made by patients to health care practitioners, provided the services are not covered under a contract with a managed care organization or health care insurer. This measure is aimed at reducing tax burdens for out-of-pocket health care expenses, which could benefit patients who pay for care outside traditional insurance networks.

Additionally, HHHCcs/HB 344 creates a GRT deduction for sales of medical equipment, supplies, and drugs when purchased by a health care practitioner or an association of health care practitioners. This applies only to items used within the scope of their practice, ensuring that tax relief is targeted at essential medical supplies.

The bill also modifies Medicaid reimbursement regulations by requiring that managed care organizations specify the gross receipts taxes included in their reimbursement rates when contracting with health care providers. This provision enhances transparency in Medicaid payments and ensures that providers receive full reimbursement for GRT liabilities, preventing unexpected tax burdens.

Finally, the bill mandates that all GRT deductions introduced or modified by this act be included in the state’s tax expenditure budget, allowing for annual tracking and evaluation of their fiscal impact.

Implications

HHHCcs/HB 344 has significant implications for both health care providers and patients in New Mexico. By permanently extending the GRT deduction for copayments and deductibles, the bill provides continued tax relief for health care practitioners, reducing the financial strain of collecting out-of-pocket payments. This measure may also prevent increased patient costs, as providers are less likely to pass on tax expenses when receiving direct payments.

The new GRT deduction for direct patient payments could encourage greater access to care outside of insurance networks, benefiting individuals who self-pay for services or those who seek treatment outside of managed care contracts. This could also incentivize more providers to offer direct-pay services, improving availability for uninsured or underinsured patients.

The tax deduction for medical equipment, supplies, and drugs is another significant financial benefit for health care practitioners, as it reduces operating costs for essential materials used in patient care. This may, in turn, lower overall health care expenses, particularly for independent practitioners and small health care businesses.

By requiring Medicaid managed care organizations to specify gross receipts taxes in reimbursement rates, the bill clarifies Medicaid payment structures and ensures that providers are not burdened with unaccounted-for tax liabilities. This change could increase provider participation in Medicaid, addressing concerns about low Medicaid reimbursement rates and encouraging more practitioners to serve Medicaid patients.

However, while the bill provides broad tax relief for health care providers, it may also reduce state and local GRT revenues. The full fiscal impact will depend on the volume of health care transactions eligible for these deductions and whether the increased accessibility to care offsets potential revenue losses. The inclusion of these deductions in the tax expenditure budget ensures that their fiscal impact can be monitored and adjusted if necessary.

Comparison of Original HB 344 and HHHCcs/HB 344

The House Health and Human Services Committee made several notable changes to the original bill:
  1.	Removal of the Fee-for-Service Deduction
	•  The original bill allowed a GRT deduction for health care providers receiving fee-for-service payments from health care insurers.
	•  The committee substitute removed this provision, meaning fee-for-service payments remain taxable.
  2.	Clarification of Medicaid Reimbursement Provisions
	•  The original bill stated that health care providers receiving Medicaid reimbursement must be reimbursed for all applicable GRT liabilities.
	•  The substitute modifies this to require that managed care organizations itemize GRT liabilities within Medicaid reimbursement rates, providing transparency without mandating separate reimbursements.
  3.	Refinement of GRT Deduction for Medical Equipment, Supplies, and Drugs
	•  The original bill provided a broad GRT deduction for all medical equipment, supplies, and drugs.
	•  The substitute clarifies that this deduction applies only to purchases made by health care practitioners or their associations for use within their practice, preventing potential abuse or unintended use of the deduction.
  4.	Inclusion of Tax Expenditure Budget Reporting Requirement
	•  The substitute explicitly requires that these GRT deductions be tracked in the tax expenditure budget, ensuring annual legislative oversight and evaluation.

These changes narrow the scope of tax relief to health care providers and managed care organizations, ensuring targeted benefits without excessive revenue losses for the state. The removal of the fee-for-service deduction suggests concerns about overly broad tax exemptions that could significantly impact state and local tax revenues. The clarification of Medicaid reimbursement policies ensures fairness and transparency without creating new state obligations for direct tax reimbursements. 
  • Floor Amendments arrow_drop_down